A GST scrutiny notice in Form ASMT-10 indicates that the tax department has identified discrepancies in your GST returns that require clarification. Having guided over 500 businesses through GST scrutiny proceedings in my practice, I can confirm that a well-prepared, documented response resolves most scrutiny cases without any adverse order.
This comprehensive guide covers everything you need to know about responding to GST scrutiny notices effectively.
A GST scrutiny notice is issued under Section 61 of the CGST Act, 2017 when the Proper Officer detects discrepancies during examination of GST returns. The notice is issued in Form GST ASMT-10 and requires a response in Form GST ASMT-11 within 30 days.
The GST system automatically flags discrepancies. Common triggers include:
| Discrepancy Type | Description | Common Cause |
|---|---|---|
| GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Mismatch | Outward supplies reported differently | Amendments, credit notes, data entry errors |
| GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A/2B Mismatch | ITC claimed exceeds available credit | Supplier filing delays, ineligible claims |
| E-way Bill Mismatch | E-way bills not matching with supplies | Multi-vehicle shipments, clerical errors |
| RCM Non-Compliance | Reverse charge not paid/reported | Unregistered purchases, import of services |
| Export Without IGST | Zero-rated supplies not properly documented | Missing LUT, shipping bill mismatches |
| ITC Reversal Issues | ITC not reversed for blocked credits | Personal use, exempt supplies |
Access the notice on GST portal:
For each issue raised, determine:
Compile comprehensive evidence based on discrepancy type:
Structure your reply systematically:
After submission:
FORM GST ASMT-11 [Reply to Notice for Scrutiny] To, The Proper Officer, [GST Jurisdiction - Ward/Circle/Division] [Address] Subject: Reply to Scrutiny Notice in Form ASMT-10 Reference: - Notice No.: ASMT10/[State Code]/[Reference Number] - Notice Date: [DD/MM/YYYY] - GSTIN: [Your 15-digit GSTIN] - Legal Name: [Registered Business Name] - Trade Name: [If different] - Tax Period under Scrutiny: [Month/Year or FY] Respected Sir/Madam, With reference to the above-mentioned scrutiny notice, I hereby submit my point-wise reply for the discrepancies noted: DISCREPANCY 1: Mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B As per Notice: Outward supplies in GSTR-1 Rs. 50,00,000 vs GSTR-3B Rs. 48,50,000. Difference: Rs. 1,50,000 Our Reply: The difference of Rs. 1,50,000 is reconciled as under: a) Credit notes issued in October 2025 for returns received: Rs. 80,000 (Credit notes CN/2025-26/45 to CN/2025-26/52 - Annexure A) b) Amendment of invoices from earlier period: Rs. 70,000 (Amendment Table 9 of GSTR-1 October 2025 - Annexure B) Reconciliation Statement enclosed as Annexure C. DISCREPANCY 2: ITC claimed in GSTR-3B exceeds GSTR-2B As per Notice: ITC claimed Rs. 4,50,000 vs GSTR-2B Rs. 4,20,000. Excess: Rs. 30,000 Our Reply: The excess ITC of Rs. 30,000 comprises: a) ITC on invoices uploaded by suppliers in subsequent months: Rs. 22,000 (Now reflecting in GSTR-2B of Nov/Dec 2025 - Annexure D) b) ITC on RCM paid for legal services: Rs. 8,000 (RCM not reflected in GSTR-2B. Invoice and payment proof - Annexure E) We have not claimed any ITC beyond our legitimate entitlement. PRAYER: In view of the above explanations and supporting documents, we humbly request your good office to accept our reply and close the scrutiny proceedings by issuing Form ASMT-12. UNDERTAKING: I hereby declare that the information provided above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. If any information is found to be incorrect, I shall be liable for action under the GST law. Date: [DD/MM/YYYY] Place: [City] [Authorized Signatory] [Name]: _______________ [Designation]: _______________ GSTIN: [Your GSTIN] List of Annexures: Annexure A: Credit notes issued Annexure B: Amendment details from GSTR-1 Annexure C: Reconciliation statement Annexure D: GSTR-2B for Nov-Dec 2025 Annexure E: RCM invoice and payment proof
Three possible outcomes:
There is no specific time limit for initiating scrutiny. However, the time limit for issuing demand notice under Section 73 is within 3 years from the due date of annual return. For Section 74 (fraud cases), it is 5 years. Scrutiny is typically initiated within 1-2 years of the relevant financial year.
Yes, you can file additional submissions or revised explanations before the proceedings are closed. Use the My Applications section to add further documents or clarifications. However, it is best to file a comprehensive response initially to avoid delays.
Personal hearing is not mandatory at scrutiny stage. However, you have the right to request a hearing under Rule 142(5). If the officer is inclined to reject your explanation, they should ideally grant a hearing before issuing an adverse order. Video conferencing hearings are now common.
Engage a GST consultant or CA when:
GST scrutiny notices are an opportunity to clarify your position before formal demand proceedings. A well-documented, point-wise response addressing each discrepancy with supporting evidence typically results in favorable closure through ASMT-12.
If you have received a GST scrutiny notice and need expert assistance, our team of indirect tax specialists has extensive experience in handling scrutiny proceedings. Get professional GST scrutiny support to ensure proper compliance and resolution.
Disclaimer: This article provides general guidance on GST scrutiny. For specific situations, consult a qualified GST professional.